But then it's a question of 20% import tax vs. So maybe a few of those string machines make their way back to Nazareth. Another aspect of a tariff historically is to drive production back into the country imposing it. Which would mean a dip in sales, production, etc. Just passing 20% on to the consumer would hurt Martin's competitive pricing badly. Martin would have to streamline its processes or find other money saving tactics in production and find an equilibrium cost to consumers that is competitive and covers the expense of the tariff. I don't think the 20% would simply be passed onto the consumer, especially in the string market. The tariff has been reported as 20% - and is not in place as of yet, but since it is widely reported as a very static number, I feel like it can be discussed. Specifically to avoid what Buck talks about above. I didn't bring up any political situation other than to say I would like to discuss the affect of the tariff in and of itself, politics aside.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |